This rumor first emerged in 2019 through an overseas Chinese-language news outlet. It suggested that influential retired party elders, including former President Jiang Zemin and former Premier Zhu Rongji, had expressed criticism of Xi Jinping’s leadership in a series of letters. Allegedly, these letters questioned Xi’s approach to economic policies, his handling of the U.S.-China trade war, and the centralization of power during his tenure. Furthermore, it was claimed that these letters urged Xi to adopt a more inclusive decision-making process.
Official responses from the Chinese government, including the CPC, categorically denied the existence of any such letters or reprimands. The government-controlled media consistently dismissed these rumors as unfounded attempts to sow discord within the party and the nation. According to official statements, Xi Jinping retained the full support of the party and the populace.
Assessing the credibility of these rumors is challenging due to the lack of transparency in China’s political landscape. Several factors must be considered when evaluating these claims. Firstly, the initial reports originated from overseas sources, which could have their own biases or agendas. Second, China’s controlled media environment limits independent verification of such claims. Third, in a secretive political milieu, rumors can be used as political tools to create uncertainty and division within the party.
Lastly, the absence of official confirmation from the Chinese government cannot be ignored. While official statements should be scrutinized, they remain the primary source of information about the inner workings of Chinese leadership. In conclusion, the notion that Xi Jinping faced reprimands from retired party leaders remains unverified. The opacity of Chinese politics, coupled with the lack of concrete evidence, keeps this claim in the realm of speculation and intrigue. Until substantiated evidence emerges, the true nature of Xi’s relationship with retired party leaders will remain a subject of debate and uncertainty.
Share this: